Document Type



Unequal Racial Access to Kidney Transplantation (with Laura Dooley and Robert Gaston), 46 Vanderbilt Law Review 805 (1993)


Access to medical care is an issue of acute and increasing importance in the United States, a country in which the most promising of ground-breaking technologies may be available to only the privileged few. Although debate about the problem of unequal access to medical care typically centers on financial obstacles to advanced therapies and the obvious inequity of allowing patients' ability to pay to drive treatment decisions, issues of equitable access for patients of both genders and all racial and ethnic backgrounds increasingly have come into focus.

These concerns about equitable access animate the ongoing debate about how government should regulate the transplantation of kidneys. More than 100,000 people in the United States suffer from kidney failure—what doctors call "end-stage renal disease" (ESRD). While kidney failure may be treated with dialysis, kidney transplantation is the preferred treatment: studies show that transplant recipients are more likely to return to work, avoid hospitalization, and enjoy a greater sense of well-being than patients on dialysis. Kidney transplants constitute more than three-fourths of the solid organ transplants performed in this country and have success rates routinely as high as eighty percent. A severe shortage of transplantable kidneys, however, limits the availability of this preferred treatment. For example, in 1990, while more than 18,000 Americans were registered on waiting lists, fewer than 8200 received renal transplants.

Date of Authorship for this Version


Included in

Law Commons