Document Type

Article

Comments

Regulating the Deficit After Bowsher v. Synar, 4 Yale Journal on Regulation 317 (1987)

Abstract

Although acknowledging that "Gramm-Rudman-Hollings"ll was
enacted "to meet a national fiscal emergency . . . of unprecedented magnitude," in Bowsher v. Synar the Supreme Court nevertheless declared its key provision unconstitutional.

Date of Authorship for this Version

1987

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS