Document Type

Article

Comments

The Nebraska Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 Nebraska Law Review 307 (1942)

Abstract

The request of the editor of the Review that I comment upon the new Nebraska rules of civil procedure, which become effective ninety days after the adjournment of the legislature next year, was one which I felt I could not refuse in view of my general interest in procedural reform. But now that I have spent some time in study of the rules and their background, I wonder if I was wise in yielding. For my experience in practice, in teaching, and in writing, and as judge seems to have so conditioned me in favor of a very simple--even “loose,” according to some people—system of pleading that I instinctively react for or against a new set of rules as they may or may not fit in with my views. Of course, that is a natural reaction of any critic; but I have the added difficulty that I have so often expressed my views as to make anything more I may say at least lack novelty. I am prompted to this confession (unusual for a judge, particularly an ex-law professor) especially by Mr. Shackelford’s vigorous dissent from the Nebraska rules; for his arguments are those with which I have been disagreeing for years and, indeed, which I attempted to combat more than a dozen years ago in a text on Code Pleading. Another iteration of my views, therefore, may not be helpful to Nebraskans; but I expect I am in honor bound to fulfill my commitment.

Date of Authorship for this Version

1942

Keywords

The Nebraska Rules of Civil Procedure, 21 Nebraska Law Review 307 (1942)

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS