Document Type

Article

Comments

48 University of Pittsburgh Law Review 691 (1987)

Abstract

Legal academe's approach to the systematic study of "legislation" resembles Congress' attitude toward balancing the federal budget: everyone agrees that it is a good thing, but laments that it is not done. A growing body of opinion bemoans legislation's "second class" status as an academic discipline and advocates substantially enhanced scholarly interest in the subject. We join this collective lament and endorse a more systematic and creative approach to teaching and writing about legislation.

Date of Authorship for this Version

1987

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS