Document Type

Article

Comments

Federalism from Federal Statutes: Health Reform, Medicaid, and the Old-Fashioned Federalists' Gamble, 81 Fordham Law Review 1749 (2013)

Abstract

How can the states retain relevance in an era of federal statutory law?

The persistence of the states and our enduring attachment to "federalism" in

an increasingly national and global regulatory environment has occupied

the minds of many scholars.' For the most part, however, the U.S. Supreme

Court, because of its role as the final expositor of constitutional meaning,

has been viewed as the primary arbiter of what federalism is and what is

required to protect it. Less often explored has been Congress's role in

giving meaning to federalism in the modem administrative state.2

Specifically, the possibility to which this Essay wishes to draw attention is

that federal statutes may now be the primary way in which state power is

created and protected. To be clear, the claim is not about federal statutes

that are modest in ambition and leave most areas exclusively to state

regulation. Rather, the claim is about major federal statutes that, even as

they extend federal power, entrust to the states much of their

implementation and elaboration.

Date of Authorship for this Version

2013

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS