Authors

Robert C. Post

Document Type

Article

Abstract

I have very little expertise in the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) or in the underlying constitutional law of freedom of religion that RFRA seeks to codify. I therefore venture into the debate surrounding Douglas NeJaime and Reva B. Siegel's Conscience Wars: Complicity-Based Conscience Claims in Religion and Politics with some diffidence, and primarily to respond to Douglas Laycock's specific argument that NeJaime and Siegel advance a position that is inconsistent with the First Amendment rights of freedom of expression of religious objectors.

Date of Authorship for this Version

2016

Included in

Law Commons

Share

COinS