What is Wrong with Inflicting Shame Sanctions?, 107 Yale L.J. 1055 (1998)
We are all aware that there was a time in the western world when punishment frequently revolved around the public humiliation of the offender. Everyone likes to read about the picturesque barbarism of the old punishments: the pillory, the stocks, the ducking stool, branding, and so on.' Many of us are also dimly aware that such shame sanctions continue to be used in much of the nonwestern world. It is common knowledge, for example, that public humiliation of a dramatic sort was featured in the law of Maoist China; its rituals of self-criticism, public admonition, and public exposure of offenders are well known. It is also widely known that such shame sanctions have continued to feature in the practice of the People's Republic,' where ,economic" criminals may still be trucked around town wearing signs describing their offenses. Many countries other than China are known for employing such practices as well.' Most recently, the media have focused on the humiliation rituals of the Islamic legal revival broadly, and of the Afghan Taliban, in particular.
Date of Authorship for this Version
Whitman, James Q., "What is Wrong with Inflicting Shame Sanctions?" (1998). Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 655.