Title
A NEW REMEDY FOR HIGH-STAKES EDUCATION LAWSUITS IN A POST-NCLB WORLD
Document Type
Article
Abstract
Sheff v. O’Neill ushered in a new wave of education reform litigation that will challenge the constitutionality of de facto segregation under state education clauses, but its remedy has been inadequate. This Article proposes a new desegregation remedy—the sliding scale remedy—to address socioeconomic isolation in this unique constitutional context. The remedy employs varying degrees of equity power depending on students’ academic outcomes. It balances concerns over local control and separation of powers with the court’s need to effectuate rights, establishes a clear remedial principle, and ensures that states and school districts focus on students as they implement remedies.
Date of Authorship for this Version
Fall 11-2009
Recommended Citation
Suarez, Christopher, "A NEW REMEDY FOR HIGH-STAKES EDUCATION LAWSUITS IN A POST-NCLB WORLD" (2009). Student Scholarship Papers. Paper 95.
http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/student_papers/95
