Document Type
Article
Comments
Regulating the Deficit After Bowsher v. Synar, 4 Yale Journal on Regulation 317 (1987)
Abstract
Although acknowledging that "Gramm-Rudman-Hollings"ll was
enacted "to meet a national fiscal emergency . . . of unprecedented magnitude," in Bowsher v. Synar the Supreme Court nevertheless declared its key provision unconstitutional.
Date of Authorship for this Version
1987
Recommended Citation
Elliott, E. Donald, "Regulating the Deficit After Bowsher v. Synar" (1987). Faculty Scholarship Series. 2198.
https://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2198