Please cite to the original publication
In recent years many political leaders and publicists have sought to prove that the treaty-making process, requiring the "undemocratic." valid and desirable preferably without congressional approval or, by a majority of Congress. 1300 executive agreements have been concluded history, as contrasted 900 i8 that up to 1928 only 15 for good reasons; treaties have been amended by have benefited the nation.
BASES OF THE PROPOSALS FOR CHANGE
The recent proposals for a change in the Constitution, either with or without benefit of a constitutional amendment, have their origin in several grievances and are said to derive moral support from several recent decisions of the Supreme Court. The modern "reform" movement may be said to have begun with Secretary Hay's denunciation of the Senate for substituting the word "treaty" for the words "special agreement" in them projected arbitration treaties of 1904.8 The movement received particular impetus from, and finds its chief present source in, the belief that the two thirds rule prevented American ratification of the Treaty of Versailles, and thus, to use President Wilson's phrase, "broke the heart of the world."
Date of Authorship for this Version
treaty, constitution, John Milton Hay, Woodrow Wilson, Treaty of Versailles
Conflict of Laws Commons, Constitutional Law Commons, Contracts Commons, Courts Commons, Dispute Resolution and Arbitration Commons, Evidence Commons, Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Politics Commons, Legal History Commons, Legislation Commons, Litigation Commons, Organizations Law Commons