Please cite to the original publication
This Article offers the first general examination of mutual fund capital structure regulation under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Article reaches two conclusions: First, the regulation of mutual funds' capital structure is incoherent. Although we might imagine several purposes for this regulation, such as limiting risks to investors and the financial system and preventing investor confusion, the regulation is not actually consistent with these purposes. It does both too much and too little to achieve them. Second, although at present the only type of security mutual funds can issue is common stock, there is no compelling reason why they should not also be allowed to issue debt securities. Debt securities might benefit investors by offering a safer and more stable alternative to the common stock of money market funds. Unlike shares in money market funds, debt securities could offer fixed interest rates and the safety of senior priorities. Such a proposal is clearly feasible, because mutual funds already borrow from banks and derivative counterparties, and they formerly issued debt securities in the era before regulation.
Date of Authorship for this Version